April 29, 2020

The Justice Index is NCAJ’s comprehensive national resource that since 2014 has collected and presented data on the presence of selected best access to justice policies in each state, as a means of expanding access to justice across the country. We are undertaking multiple projects to update the findings contained in the Justice Index.

Background. Before describing the current updating projects, here is some information about the Justice Index: i) recommendations of experts describing the value of Justice Index 2016, ii) materials citing and using the Justice Index (news clips, reports, op eds, etc.), and iii) an announcement and video created by the American Bar Association when conferring the ABA’s Pro Bono Publico Award on the teams of volunteers that built the Justice Index with NCAJ.

The Survey. On April 29, NCAJ emailed a Justice Index 2020 Survey to court officials and Access to Justice Commission officials in the 50 states, Washington, DC and Puerto Rico. As in previous years, the 2020 Survey asks whether selected policies for assuring access to justice have been adopted in the states in the four traditional Justice Index categories of attorney access, self-help, language access and disability access. The 2020 Survey updates the existing questions and adds new questions that expand the Justice Index’s coverage. We are inviting responses to the Survey by May 19, 2020, understanding that more time will be needed by some of the respondents in light of the challenges posed by the global public health crisis and its consequences (discussed in greater detail, below). In addition to the survey, the Justice Index research includes our Attorney Count, through which we – with the help of additional pro bono collaborators – determine the number of attorneys working for legal aid organizations in each of our target jurisdictions.

Complementary Research. As a complement to the Survey, NCAJ and its pro bono partners are also carrying out additional research on the presence of policies across the country for curbing excessive fines and fees.

Pro Bono Support. NCAJ’s Justice Index initiatives are supported by pro bono attorneys, staff and students, including from six law firms and additional corporations. These colleagues will be conducting research on state policies, communicating with state officials, and organizing the updated findings. Ultimately, NCAJ will work with officials in the states and with the pro bono teams to publish findings from our research that will assist access to justice efforts in each state by providing both a roadmap of recommended policies and practices and a simple, numerical scale comparing policy environments across jurisdictions that can help advocates argue for better funding and better policies.

Timing During The Current Public Health Crisis. Access to justice is always important, and is especially important in this time of crisis. We understand that COVID-19 and its consequences have shut many courts to non-essential business, kept many court staff working from home, and imposed substantial additional burdens on every person. We have chosen to begin our data collection now – despite these difficulties – because of the important role the courts will inevitably play in sorting out the devastation from this crisis, and in helping people to move on and rebuild. In talking with people in diverse settings who are knowledgeable about many different aspects of state justice systems, it became clear to us that while there is no perfect time, now is an important time for this work.

The Survey and Related Justice Index Materials:

  • Complete Survey (all four sections)(MS Word, here; PDF, here)
    • Attorney Access Section (here)
    • Self-Help Access Section (here)
    • Language Access Section (here)
    • Disability Access Section (here)
    • Overview of Survey (here)
  • Justice Index 2016 (here)
    • Experts’ statements about Justice Index 2016 (here)
    • Justice Index news clips and citations (here)
    • Justice Index award from American Bar Association (here)
  • NCAJ’s website (here)

Questions. Thank you for learning about the Justice Index. We invite you to join forces in this effort. We will post Justice Index periodic updates on this NCAJ blog and website. We also welcome questions at info@ncforaj.org. The Justice Index 2020 Update is guided by David Udell, Executive Director; Jamie Gamble, Director of the Justice Index Project; and Chris Albin-Lackey, Legal and Policy Director. [4-29-20]

Recent Articles

Rikers and Mental Illness

Join us on September 13th at 6:30 pm as NCAJ's Legal & Policy Director Lauren Jones leads this panel of NYC leaders in this timely and critical conversation...

In NY Times Op Ed, NCAJ asks "What's Wrong with Getting a Little Free Legal Advice"

NCAJ Executive Director David Udell and Fordham Law Prof. Bruce Green describe in their New York Times Op Ed why the First Amendment protects the freedom of a reverend in the South Bronx to talk with community residents about the basic problems of everyday life including by advising them on how to complete court forms provided by the New York Courts for use by lay people.

New Findings on Fines & Fees Policies, Released Today by the National Center for Access to Justice, Rank the States & Provide a 50-State Policy Reform Agenda

In 2016, a court in Lexington County, South Carolina ordered Twanda Marshinda Brown, a single mother who worked at Burger King, to pay $2,300 for two traffic offenses. Although she told the court she could only afford to pay $50 each month, the judge ordered her to pay $100 in monthly installments. Ms. Brown managed to make the payments for five months but she fell behind when her son was hospitalized and several checks from her employer bounced. The sheriff’s office ...

NCAJ Files Amicus Brief to Protect Access to Justice for Indigent People in Prison

On June 25 the National Center for Access to Justice filed a brief as lead amicus (“friend of the court”) in Rosa v. Doe in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On behalf of nine organizations, the amicus brief urges the Circuit Court to guide its federal district courts on how to ensure that people in state prison are not forced by substantial federal court filing fees to choose between pursuing justice in court and covering their “necessary expenses” including their expenditures for family members.